<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Before there was Aromaleigh, there was Girlactik</title>
	<atom:link href="http://savvythinker.com/review-before-there-was-aromaleigh-there-was-girlactik/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://savvythinker.com/review-before-there-was-aromaleigh-there-was-girlactik/</link>
	<description>thinking about life, playing with makeup</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karin</title>
		<link>http://savvythinker.com/review-before-there-was-aromaleigh-there-was-girlactik/comment-page-1/#comment-127674</link>
		<dc:creator>Karin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savvythinker.com/?p=2514#comment-127674</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to see how pretty the color is when I used it only to dry line with and my camera isn&#039;t the best.  But it is very pretty.  

A lot of things bother me, especially if the glitter has sharp edges.  This does not.  

There are not nearly as many choices as there are for AL, but I do like what I have.

Interestingly MUA gives them a 4.2 out of 5, mentions that they are cut round and have no fillers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to see how pretty the color is when I used it only to dry line with and my camera isn&#8217;t the best.  But it is very pretty.  </p>
<p>A lot of things bother me, especially if the glitter has sharp edges.  This does not.  </p>
<p>There are not nearly as many choices as there are for AL, but I do like what I have.</p>
<p>Interestingly MUA gives them a 4.2 out of 5, mentions that they are cut round and have no fillers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatteredshards</title>
		<link>http://savvythinker.com/review-before-there-was-aromaleigh-there-was-girlactik/comment-page-1/#comment-127673</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatteredshards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savvythinker.com/?p=2514#comment-127673</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, yeah, I don&#039;t buy from companies that aren&#039;t upfront about their ingredients. The fact that I&#039;ve spent 15 minutes coaxing Google and I can&#039;t find an ingredients list for ANY Girlactik product is not good.

But I&#039;ll bet you the first ingredient of the eyeshadows, and possibly the face powders as well, is talc, which has been linked to cancer, and the gel and liquid products contain petroleum/mineral oil, which I am allergic to.

But that&#039;s okay, Girlactik isn&#039;t bright or unique enough for my tastes, anyhow. Not by their product photos, and, unfortunately, not by your FOTD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, yeah, I don&#8217;t buy from companies that aren&#8217;t upfront about their ingredients. The fact that I&#8217;ve spent 15 minutes coaxing Google and I can&#8217;t find an ingredients list for ANY Girlactik product is not good.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll bet you the first ingredient of the eyeshadows, and possibly the face powders as well, is talc, which has been linked to cancer, and the gel and liquid products contain petroleum/mineral oil, which I am allergic to.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s okay, Girlactik isn&#8217;t bright or unique enough for my tastes, anyhow. Not by their product photos, and, unfortunately, not by your FOTD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

